The BBC is “deeply unimpressed” with an off-air chat in which two of its high-profile journalists joked about the gender pay gap, a BBC source has said.
Radio 4’s Today presenter John Humphrys and North America editor Jon Sopel were discussing Carrie Gracie, who had quit as China editor over equal pay.
Before Monday’s show, and reported, they joked of “handing over” pay to keep Gracie in the role.
A BBC spokeswoman said the presenter regrets the “ill-advised” conversation.
Humphrys told the Times the off-air chat was “nothing to do” with the campaign by Gracie.
He said: “This was what I thought was an exchange between two old friends who have known each other for 30 years and were taking the mickey out of each other.”
BBC management are understood to be “deeply unimpressed” with the unaired discussion, which took place ahead of a pre-recorded interview for Monday morning’s edition of Today.
In an , Gracie had accused the corporation of having a “secretive and illegal pay culture”.
She quit because of pay inequality with her male counterparts – including Sopel – who were earning more than her £135,000-a-year salary.
Last year the BBC listed all the salaries of all employees earning more than £150,000 a year, which revealed Sopel, the US editor, earned £200,000-£249,999, while Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen earned £150,000-£199,999.
It also showed that Humphrys, who has presented the Today programme since 1987, had a salary of £600,000-£649,000.
Speaking in the Radio 4 studio, Humphrys reportedly asked Sopel about “how much of your salary you are prepared to hand over to Carrie Gracie to keep her”.
He then referred to “other men who are earning too much” at the BBC.
Sopel is understood to have replied that “if we are talking about the scope for the greatest redistribution I’ll have to come back and say well yes Mr Humphrys”.
The presenter is then reported to have uttered a profanity and said that he was “still left with more [pay] than anybody else”.
And this was all before took her place as co-presenter of Today. This was the attitude of these back slapping entitled males.
— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam)
Miriam O’Reilly, , described the exchange as “base, smug and condescending”.
Claiming to have heard a recording of the chat, Ms O’Reilly said it represented the attitude of “back-slapping entitled males”.
She also said she had been dropped from Friday’s Today programme, when she was expecting to talk about equal pay, adding that she believed it was because of concern she would mention the leaked tape on air.
A BBC spokeswoman denied this, saying it was because the item on the programme had become “a much broader discussion about social change” and another guest was more suitable.
She added: “The Today programme often makes changes to schedules and contributors in the run-up to broadcast… It’s wrong to suggest anything else.”
I believe the person who made the decision to stand me down this morning was concerned I would mention the leaked tape on air. If Mr Humphrys was interviewing me I quite possibly would have – but why not – he would have done the same – it’s called freedom of speech.
— Miriam O’Reilly (@OReillyMiriam)
Deputy Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson asked in a tweet whether Humphrys would be prohibited from presenting stories on the issue of gender impartiality.
Earlier this week, presenter , while Woman’s Hour’s Jane Garvey, a prominent campaigner for equal pay, said she was unable to conduct an interview with Gracie for the show.
But a BBC spokeswoman said Humphrys could continue to present items on equal pay as he had not shown support for a particular position on the topic, adding that “he is bound by the same rules on impartiality as all other BBC presenters”.
After the conversation between Humphrys and Sopel became public, Garvey tweeted: “The Humphrys-Sopel exchange reveals, very neatly, what we’re up against.”
The – Sopel exchange reveals, very neatly, what we’re up against. And a useful reminder to be ever careful in a room with microphones.
— Jane Garvey (@janegarvey1)